G. DEL ZANNA

La fine dell’impero ottomano

Il libro racconta i decenni che dalla fine dell’800 alla Grande Guerra portarono alla dissoluzione dell’impero ottomano e alla nascita della Repubblica turca nel 1923. Gli eventi sono letti nel quadro del crescente processo di globalizzazione: dai tentativi di riforma delle strutture imperiali alle spinte secessioniste dei movimenti nazionali, dalla crisi violenta della coabitazione islamo-cristiana alla nascita di uno Stato-nazione turco riconosciuto a livello internazionale, ma anche indebolito dalla fine del suo pluralismo interno.

Giorgio Del Zanna insegna Storia dell’Europa orientale nella Facoltà di Lettere dell’Università Cattolica di Milano. Fra i suoi libri: «Roma e l’Oriente. Leone XIII e l’Impero ottomano» (2003), «Il mondo visto dall’Italia» (con A. Giovagnoli, 2004), pubblicati da Guerini. Con il Mulino ha pubblicato «I cristiani e il Medio Oriente» (2011).

Il mulino

Revolts and uprisings in the era of nationalism (1804-1908)

International conference, November 2013 at Panteion University,
Athens

Deadline:1 April 2013

Description
The chronological frame of the conference extends from the first Serbian uprising (1804) to the Young Turk Revolution (1908). During these hundred years, the map of Southeastern Europe was reshaped through a series of revolutionary movements, mainly national and liberal. Besides, this part of Europe, mostly under Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman rule, experienced the echo of the European revolutions in 1830 and 1848, and of the unification of Italy and of Germany. We may claim that the “Age of Revolutions” in the Balkans expanded until the early twentieth century. Starting from the main thematic axis of revolutionary movements in the Balkans, our objective is to revisit the existing literature in order to put new questions in a comparative and multiperspective way. We are interested in new empirical data that will support comparative thinking about various Balkan cases but also with reference to the Western paradigm. Fields of study could be the personnel involved in different ways in these movements (focusing particularly on the role of women), the diverse ways Europe and the West responded to these movements and how these movements mirrored European developments, the varied identities (pre-existing or under construction) and the ways these movements were commemorated in different national contexts during the nineteenth and the twentieth century. A specific emphasis is placed on the economic and social parameters of revolts as well as on reforms initiated in order to prevent social upheavals or as a result of the modernization project. Experiencing the Revolution at the local and everyday life level by ordinary people will also be an important field of study.

The main aim of the conference is to convey a multi-disciplinary analysis of the question what a “Revolution” in the Balkans was during the long nineteenth century in a broader semantic and social context: Is it possible to build a typology of revolutionary movements in the Balkans? What is the relation of these movements with the ones in Western Europe of that time? Is there a kind of “revolutionary recipe” travelling around Europe via cultural transfers? What are the local characteristics of revolts in different parts of South-East Europe? Who were the revolutionaries? Which is the relation between Revolution and Reform? Which is the historiography and which is the memory of these movements? It is also important to investigate the instances of what was opposite to Revolution, its conceptual ‘other’ under different faces: counter-revolution; reform; evolutionism/traditionalism; alternative loyalties etc.
Conference overview
In particular the conference will be organized around the following themes:
a. Nationalism and the creation of nation-states: different cases and processes of nation-building expressed through revolts and uprisings. Alternative forms of political loyalty and group identity that were competitors to nationalism.
b. People: Intellectuals, Military, Politicians, Women. We are particularly interested in “hybrid” cases and fluid identities -personalities participating in other than their national revolutionary movement or changing identity during their life.
c. Counter-revolutions: the fear of revolution; reactions to revolutions from the old political and social order.
d. Revolts and Violence: violence as part of traditional societies; violence as catalyst in historical change; revolutionary violence; the stereotype of a “Balkan” violence.
e. The everyday life during a revolution: City and country; how ordinary people experience a revolutionary movement; changes in people’s lives as long as a revolt lasts; the everyday life of revolutionaries.
f. Symbols and rituals of a revolution: Flags, songs, all forms of symbolic expression.
g. Europe and the Balkans: Responses to the Balkan revolutionary movements in the West and how the West perceived these events; cultural transfers between Western and Southeastern Europe (ideas, people, vocabulary); transfer of western ideologies in a Balkan context; the role of the “Great Powers”.
h. Tradition, Modernization and Reform: Traditional and modernizing elements in revolutionary movements; reforms as a result of revolutionary movements; reforms without revolts; reforms in order to avoid revolts.4
i. Historiography: National historiography on revolutionary movements; western historiography; alternative and revisionist approaches.
j. Art and Memory: Commemoration of revolts, uprisings and revolutions. How art represents these events then and how memory deals with them over time.
Scientific Committee
Prof. Halil Berktay, Sabanci University, Istanbul
Prof. Hannes Grandits, Humboldt University, Berlin
Assoc. Prof. Alexander Kitroeff, Haverford College, USA
Prof. Christina Koulouri, Panteion University, Athens
Prof. Diana Mishkova, Centre for Advanced Study, Sofia
Prof. Stefanos Papageorgiou, Panteion University, Athens
Dr Dubravka Stojanovic, University of Belgrade
Organizing Committee
Christina Koulouri (Panteion University)
Kostas Katsapis (KENI, Panteion University)
Alexandra Patrikiou (KENI, Panteion University) Evdoxia Papadopoulou (KENI, Panteion University) Chrissa Tzagaroulaki (KENI, Panteion University)
Secretariat: Alexandra Patrikiou (KENI, Panteion University)
We welcome proposals for papers of 15-20 minutes from established scholars, postdoctoral researchers, postgraduate students, independent researchers and educators from various backgrounds. Submission of 300-word proposals in English (abstract only; no full papers) along with short bios should be sent to keni.panteionuniversity@gmail.com by 1 April 2013. Since funding to cover the entire conference is not certified yet, guests are encouraged, if indeed they have this possibility, to acquire individual funding from their home Institution. We will notify for the approved papers by 15 May 2013.

Venezia, 4-5 marzo 2013

Programma
Lunedì, 4 marzo 2013
Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti
Sala Portego del Palazzo Franchetti
Ore 9:30 Apertura dei lavori
Prof. Gian Antonio DANIELI, Presidente, Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti
Prof. Rudolf DINU, Direttore, Istituto Romeno di Cultura e Ricerca Umanistica di Venezia
Ore 10:00
Moderatore: Gilberto PIZZAMIGLIO (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia)
Nicola BERGAMO (EHESS Parigi, Associazione Culturale Bisanzio)
Venezia e l’Iconoclasmo
Luigi Andrea BERTO (Western Michigan University)
Guardare ad est e ad ovest a Venezia durante l’alto Medioevo
Şerban MARIN (Archivi Nazionali della Romania)
What Does It Mean a Crusade? The Crusading Elements according to the Venetian
Chronicles
Ore 11:00 Pausa caffè
Ore 11:30
Guillaume SAINT-GUILLAIN (Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens)
Les bailes vénitiens de Négrepont au XIIIe et dans la première moitié du XIVe siècle:
origines, recrutement et carrières
Manuela DOBRE (Università di Bucarest)
Venise et les vénitiens dans les sources byzantines du XVe siècle
Marcella FERRACCIOLI & Gianfranco GIRAUDO (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia)
Perché viaggiare? Conoscere l’Oriente?
Discussioni
Istituto Romeno di Cultura e Ricerca Umanistica di Venezia
Aula conferenze “Marian Papahagi”
Ore 14:00 Pranzo
Ore 16:00
Moderatore: Şerban MARIN (Archivi Nazionali della Romania)
Dana-Silvia CACIUR (Istituto Romeno di Cultura e Ricerca Umanistica di Venezia)
Considerations regarding the Theories on the Origin of the Morlachs
Florina CIURE (Istituto Romeno di Cultura e Ricerca Umanistica di Venezia; Muzeul Ţării
Crişurilor, Oradea)
Il veneziano Agostino Serena, maestro tagliapietra in Transilvania nel Seicento
Josef KOOHESTANIAN (Università degli Studi di Firenze)
Nietzsche a Venezia
Discussioni

Martedì, 5 marzo 2013
Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia
Sala “Giovanni Morelli” del Polo Umanistico di Malcanton-Marcorà
Ore 9:30 Apertura dei lavori
Prof. Carlo CARRARO, Magnifico Rettore, Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia
Dott. Şerban MARIN, Archivi Nazionali della Romania
Ore 10:00
Moderatore: Gianfranco GIRAUDO (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia)
Andrea NANETTI (Nanyang Technological University, Singapore)
East and West in the Venetian Diaries (1400-1533)
Chiara FRISON (Centro di Studi Medievali e Rinascimentali ‘E.A. Cicogna’, Venezia)
Venezia tra Oriente ed Occidente: la Chronica dela nobil cità de Venetia et dela sua
Provintia et Destretto (origini – 1458) di Giorgio Dolfin
Dorit RAINES (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia)
‘Occidente’ e ‘Oriente’ nella storiografia pubblica veneziana
Ore 11:00 Pausa caffè
Ore 11:30
Andrea ZINATO (Università degli Studi di Verona)
La conquista e l’assedio di Castelnuovo (Herceg Novi) 1538-1539: l’Impero spagnolo,
la Serenissima e la Sublime Porta
Aldo FERRARI (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia)
I fratelli Ayvazean/Ajvazovskij tra la Crimea e Venezia
Giampiero BELLINGERI (Università Ca’ Foscari, Venezia)
Venezia tra persiani e turchi
Discussioni
Ore 13:00 Conclusioni e chiusura dei lavori

Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti
Sala Portego del Palazzo Franchetti
Campo Santo Stefano, Venezia
Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia
Sala “Giovanni Morelli” del Polo Umanistico di Malcanton-Marcorà
Dorsoduro, 3484/D – 30123 Venezia
Istituto Romeno di Cultura e Ricerca Umanistica di Venezia
Aula conferenze “Marian Papahagi”
Cannaregio 2214, 30121 Venezia
Organizzato da
ISTITUTO ROMENO DI CULTURA E RICERCA UMANISTICA DI VENEZIA
Cannaregio 2214, 30121 Venezia
Tel. +39 041 524 23 09
Fax +39 041 715 331
E-mail: istiorga@tin.it

http://www.icr.ro/venezia/

Con il patrocinio di
ISTITUTO VENETO DI SCIENZE, LETTERE ED ARTI
UNIVERSITÀ CA’ FOSCARI DI VENEZIA

(a cura di Francesco Leoncini)

L’alba dell’Europa liberale. La trama internazionale delle cospirazioni risorgimentali

Contributi di: Pavel Balcárek, Pietro Brunelli, Francesca Brunet, Antoni Cetnarowicz, Michal Chvojka, Luigi Contegiacomo, Francesco Leoncini, Giuseppe Monsagrati, László Pete, Dušan Uhlíř

Una Penisola dilacerata da secolari divisioni e antagonismi e dominata dallo straniero ha ritrovato nel lungo cinquantennio 1818-1870 artefici e contenuti ideali per un processo unitario che ha costituito un modello per tutti i popoli che aspiravano a un riscatto nazionale.

Gli inizi di questo straordinario periodo sono ricostruiti attraverso i saggi di autorevoli studiosi che danno conto  della formazione di quel vasto movimento democratico europeo che si sviluppò subito all’indomani della restaurazione asburgica e della implacabile e meticolosa repressione che esso subì ad opera del potere costituito. Particolare attenzione è rivolta alle condizioni dell’Europa centrale, intesa come area che va dal Baltico all’Egeo, e quindi alla rinascita nazionale degli Slavi del Sud, oltre all’approfondimento sulla gestione punitiva del delitto politico e  sui metodi di detenzione  legati  alla prigionia nella fortezza dello Spielberg a  Brünn (Brno) e nel Castello di Szeged (Seghedino).

Il Risorgimento appare quindi fin dai suoi inizi in una prospettiva che va ben oltre lo scenario nazionale per acquisire in quest’opera quella dimensione culturale e quella capacità di mobilitazione organizzativa che ne fanno uno dei momenti più luminosi della storia europea moderna.

Il volume rappresenta un originale contributo alle celebrazioni per il 150° anniversario dell’Unità d’Italia e nasce dagli interventi al Convegno internazionale organizzato il 28 settembre 2011 a Brno

per iniziativa del Consiglio regionale del Veneto, dell’Archivio di Stato di Rovigo, dell’Associazione Minelliana della stessa città, del Comune di Fratta Polesine, dove si ebbero i primi episodi di opposizione carbonara nel Lombardo-Veneto, del Museo dello Spielberg, della Regione della Moravia del Sud, con il sostegno della Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Padova e Rovigo.

Esso è corredato da un ricco apparato illustrativo con immagini d’epoca e foto della cerimonia celebrativa nel capoluogo moravo e di momenti del Convegno.

Minellia,

22-23 novembre 2012
Trieste, Biblioteca Statale «Stelio Crise», Largo Papa Giovanni XXIII n. 7

Programma

Il convegno si svolge all’interno dell’iniziativa

I FESTIVAL DI STORIA E CULTURA

‘SODALITAS’ ADRIATICO-DANUBIANA, ASSOCIAZIONE CULTURALE ITALOUNGHERESE «PIER PAOLO VERGERIO»
TRIESTE,

22-23 novembre 2012
Sala conferenze della Biblioteca Statale «Stelio Crise»
Largo Papa Giovanni XXIII, 7
AURISINA, 24 novembre 2012
Casa della Pietra «Igo Gruden»
ADRIA-DANUBIA

Informazioni
assitung@vergerio.eu; sodalitas@adria-danubia.eu
www.vergerio.eu; www.adria-danubia.eu

Georges Castellan, Marie Vrinat-Nikolov

Scritto a quattro mani da Georges Castellan e Marie Vrinat-Nikolov, Storia della Bulgaria alza il sipario su uno dei paesi europei meno conosciuti, realizzando così una tappa decisiva del progetto di Argo di contribuire a far conoscere al pubblico italiano il ‘continente’ balcanico. Peculiarità del saggio, il sapiente ed equilibrato intreccio tra l’affresco delle vicende storiche e le varie, vivacissime fasi della cultura del popolo bulgaro. La narrazione si sviluppa in modo lineare: dopo le vicende antiche, in gran parte interne alla storia greca e romana, la Bulgaria comincia ad assumere – almeno linguisticamente – la fisionomia a noi nota con la colonizzazione dei popoli slavi nei secoli VI e VII. Ma è con i protobulgari e il mitico ‘zar’ Simeone (893- 927) che queste antiche popolazioni si guadagnano un posto di prestigio nella storia imponendosi perfino all’impero bizantino. Poi, a par tire dal 1396, si abbatterà il lunghissimo dominio ottomano, che si dissolverà solo con la guerra russo-turca (1877-1878). L’autonomia finalmente ritrovata non porterà tuttavia serenità al generoso popolo bulgaro: prima le disastrose guerre balcaniche, poi le infelici alleanze militari nella prima e soprattutto nella sconda guerra mondiale, infine il lungo periodo all’ombra dell’Unione Sovietica. Un’autonomia vera del paese delle rose ha date recenti e quindi il carattere della cronaca: dal 2007 la Bulgaria fa anche parte dell’Unione europea ricucendo così una storia troppo a lungo lacerata.

Indice

Argo

During the early modern and modern age, significant political, economic, national or technological mutations completely transformed the structure, direction and organisation of European trade. The Mediterranean world faced the competition of the West on an emerging global market that challenged the traditional commercial ingredients, instruments and recipes that merchants employed. Nevertheless, the South–Eastern part of the continent remained in the periphery of this new economic map, with its links to the core strangulated and suffocated by the political and juridical status of the Lower Danubian area and the Black Sea region. This classical historiographic perspective has been refuted by scholars trying to prove that the closing of the Straits was rather relative and that the Ottoman economic control was not extremely restrictive. The maritime routes connecting the Romanian Principalities to the Eastern Mediterranean could be used in disguise, by Greek merchants or other Ottoman subjects who employed Constantinople as a relay in these exchanges on the East–West axis. In the same time, terrestrial routes across the Balkans or towards the Austrian Empire secured good and reliable links to the global market.

Aim: Starting from these theoretical premises, the conference aims to bring together scholars whose work relate to the economic history of South–Eastern Europe and its convergences to the world market across the whole of the early modern and modern period (16th–19th centuries).

Program

Frontière politique et identifications : Des populations entre Ottomans et Habsbourg au XVIIIe siècle

L’objectif de cette conférence est de réunir des chercheurs venus de différents pays – France, Serbie et Croatie – afin d’échanger sur la question des identifications aux frontières austro-ottomanes au XVIIIe siècle. Ce type de problématique a déjà été largement traité pour l’espace hexagonal et méditerranéen en France. Mais la situation de cette frontière terrestre qui passait, à l’époque, pour la limite orientale de l’Europe chrétienne puis de l’Europe policée ou éclairée, est beaucoup moins connue. Pourtant, l’histoire de la frontière en Europe centrale et balkanique s’appuie sur une tradition historiographique déjà longue et continue à faire l’objet de nombreux travaux portant sur des sources encore peu étudiées. Cette table ronde, qui se tiendra en anglais et en français, sera donc l’occasion de découvrir et de discuter ces perspectives de recherche.
Problématique :
Après le deuxième siège de Vienne en 1683, les frontières entre les puissances habsbourgeoise et ottomane ont été repoussées loin des pays autrichiens. Les traités de Karlowitz (1699), Passarowitz (1718), Belgrade (1740) et Sistova (1791) définissent une limite qui sépare les provinces d’Olténie, de Syrmie, du Banat, de Serbie et de la Bačka en suivant grosso modo le Danube. Les techniques de consolidation de la frontière militaire du côté habsbourgeois ont déjà été largement traitées par l’historiographie. L’autonomie politique et les formes de vie sociale particulières dans la région des confins militaires autrichiens sont elles-aussi bien connues. Mais l’enjeu que constitue la fixation et, plus encore, la permanence de la frontière politique pour les populations locales n’a pas encore fait l’objet d’une étude systématique. Une telle lacune peut paraître explicable dans la mesure où cette limite passe encore auprès de beaucoup pour l’extrémité orientale de l’Europe chrétienne voire de l’Europe policée. Le rôle de démarcation entre civilisations qu’elle a joué et continue d’occuper dans l’imaginaire collectif nous encourage à privilégier aujourd’hui une de ses dimensions oubliées, celle de lieu de passage.
Dans cette perspective, au-delà de la construction par les deux puissances ennemies de la ligne et de la zone frontière, c’est bien d’une population-frontière dont il faut s’occuper. Le
trait de frontière tracé au début du XVIIIe siècle constitue en effet une réalité nouvelle pour des hommes réunis au siècle précédent sous la Pax Ottomanica. Si elle divise, en empêchant ou ralentissant les contacts, elle est aussi une aubaine. La loyauté des populations locales envers les deux empires ennemis est un enjeu majeur en temps de guerre comme en temps de paix. Dans ce cadre, les définitions individuelles et collectives de l’appartenance politique et des droits qui lui sont associés dans les efforts de consolidation de la frontière des deux côtés jouent un rôle important. L’opportunisme dans la définition identitaire, l’incompréhension totale entre deux mondes, la mention d’une appartenance collective qui ne correspond pas toujours aux catégories en usage chez les administrateurs peuvent également intervenir dans le détournement de cette identification.
Du côté des États, la logique d’attribution des privilèges collectifs visant à s’assurer la participation des populations à l’effort de guerre coexiste avec la volonté d’exclure des zones stratégiques les ennemis potentiels. Communautés récemment immigrées, nouveaux convertis, fidèles d’une Église orthodoxe puissante et organisée des deux côtés de la frontière ou encore marchands passant fréquemment d’un empire à l’autre restent suspects. L’identification politique, qui permet de différencier sujets ottomans et habsbourgeois, et l’identification confessionnelle restent longtemps les outils principaux utilisés par Vienne et Istanbul dans le contrôle de la frontière. Mais l’incertitude de cette identification sur le terrain, la valeur changeante donnée à ces appartenances, sans oublier l’intervention d’autres critères – origine géographique, langue, statut social – prennent une place variable dans la pratique des institutions concernées.
Tous ces phénomènes attirent notre attention sur les usages de l’identification. En quoi se heurtent-ils à l’identité revendiquée par ceux qui passent la frontière ou vivent auprès d’elle, malgré un travail d’adaptation permanent mené par les fonctionnaires ? Comment cet outil, conçu pour contrôler la mobilité des habitants et éloigner les étrangers indésirables, peut-il être détourné par cette population-frontière ? Qu’est-ce que les contestations ouvertes de ce système de contrôle – fuite de communautés entières, banditisme transfrontalier, révoltes paysannes soutenues par la puissance adverse – nous apprennent sur le cadre politique du dialogue entre communautés et État à la frontière ? Dans quelle mesure peut-on parler de l’autonomie d’une société frontalière ou transfrontalière ? Plus qu’une logique de rationalisation des pratiques d’identification, ce sont les conflits et négociations sur les critères d’identification et leur usage politique entre communautés rurales, notables locaux, responsables religieux, chefs militaires, compagnies commerciales et autorités impériales qui seront au centre de notre propos.

Program

Igor Despot

The Balkan Wars in the Eyes of the Warring Parties: Perceptions and Interpretations

In the fall of 1912, the Ottoman Empire was in turmoil. In addition to the Albanian and the Yemen rebellions, the Empire was at war with Italy over the Libyan territory. Worse yet, cholera was spreading throughout the country, leaving a decimated population in its wake. In its weakness, the Ottoman Empire was ripe to be attacked, and the Balkan countries did so. On October 8, 1912, Montenegro declared war on the Ottoman Empire, beginning the first of the Balkan Wars. Embracing maturity and setting their differences aside, four nations joined together to form the Balkan League—Serbia, Greece, Montenegro, and Bulgaria.

Despite the tremendous land victory celebrated by the Balkan League, disputes over dividing the won territory soon arose. Dissatisfied with its share of the Macedonia, Bulgaria attacked its former allies Serbia and Greece. On August 10, 1913, the Treaty of Bucharest ended the second conflict, but it did not bring the peace. In the First World War, which was initiated by Sarajevo assassination, Balkan again became theater of the war.

The Balkan wars have been a popular topic for scholarly research since their resolution. Despite the attention this topic has received, however, the research is far from complete. In this study contributing to the documentation and understanding of this conflict, author Igor Despot has not only reviews the events of the wars, but also considers these events in light of pertinent cultural aspects, identifying the commonalities and differences that may have determined alliances or sparked conflict throughout Balkan history.

Igor Despot was born in Zagreb. He graduated from the faculty of humanities and social science of the University of Zagreb in 1998, obtaining the degree of history and philosophy professor. He obtained his master’s degree on 2008 from the same faculty. This is his PhD dissertation, which he defended in 2012.

iUniverse

Edited by Matthew P. Fitzpatrick

Liberal Imperialism in Europe

The nature of European imperialism during the “long nineteenth century” is still contested. Although the shadows of the old polemic framed by Schumpeter and Lenin’s diametrically opposed positions are still occasionally cast upon the discussion, more recent appraisals of European imperialism have emphasized its relationship to both the consolidation of liberalism in Europe and attempts to globalize the economies and value systems of European nation states. Given this new line of inquiry, the exact relationship between the various forms of liberalism in Europe and the various imperial projects of Europe have yet to be scrutinized. Was there an overarching European project of liberal imperialism or were there overriding regional and national differences that differentiated the imperialism/s of the various European states? Did the contours of the domestic struggles between liberals and non-liberals (particularly conservatives and socialists) as well between different types of liberals leave a significant imprint on the expansionist policies of European states or was there a national consensus that eroded party lines on issues of foreign policy? What was the social composition of the supporters of empire in civil society? Is it possible to speak of a popular movement for empire? In this state-of-the-field anthology, leading scholars in the fields of European imperial history and intellectual history explore these questions and more, in order to thoroughly investigate the phenomenon of “liberal imperialism.”

Contents
Particular or Universal?: Historicising Liberal Approaches to Empire in Europe. Matthew P. Fitzpatrick
Imperialism after the Great Wave: The Dutch Case in the Netherlands East Indies, 1860-1914—Elsbeth Locher-Scholten
Italy, Liberalism and the Age of Empire—Giuseppi Finaldi
Russian Liberalism and the Problem of Imperial Diversity—Alexander Semyonov
Liberty, Equality and Nationality: National Liberalism, Modernization and Empire in Hungary in the 19th Century—László Kürti
From Independence to Trialism: The Croatian Party of Right and the Project for a Liberal ‘Greater Croatia’ within the Habsburg Empire, 1861-1914—Nevenko Bartulin
Between Völkisch and Universal Visions of Empire: Liberal Imperialism in Mitteleuropa 1890-1918—Eric Kurlander
An Empire of Scientific Experts: Polish Physicians and the Medicalization of the German Borderlands, 1880-1914—Lenny A. Ureña Valerio
The Ottoman Empire’s Negotiation of Western Liberal Imperialism—Fatma Müge-Göçek and Murat Özyüksel
British and Greek Liberalism and Imperialism in the Long Nineteenth Century—Andrekos Varnava

MATTHEW FITZPATRICK is a Senior Lecturer in International History at Flinders University, Australia.

Palgrave Macmillan