10 e 11 aprile 2013

Mercoledì 10 aprile ore 9:00
Aula 6/7 Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia
Giovedì 11 aprile ore 10:00
Aula Imbucci
Università degli Studi di Salerno

L’Europa sul web, nelle sale cinematografiche, in radio, nelle scuole, all’università e in eventi pubblici. Per un anno sarà protagonista su Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso. Per rispondere alla crisi, con nuova forza e idealità.

Passaggio a sudest: speciali del programma Passaggio a sudest

Il progetto

Racconta l’Europa all’Europa così abbiamo intitolato il progetto europeo che ci vedrà impegnati per tutto il prossimo anno. Del resto contribuire al dibattito sull’Europa è uno degli obiettivi di Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso fin dal suo esordio.

Inizialmente la ragione d’essere di OBC era quella di riflettere sulle conseguenze della guerra in Europa e sul sostegno alla ricostruzione dei Balcani. Con il tempo la situazione è gradualmente migliorata e dall’aiuto umanitario si è passati a discutere di armonizzazione di sistemi giuridici e consolidamenti democratici.

Il prossimo luglio la Croazia diventerà il 28esimo membro dell’Unione. Ma, a seconda del punto di partenza, negli ultimi anni anche gli altri paesi della regione hanno fatto passi avanti nel processo di democratizzazione avendo di fronte la prospettiva dell’integrazione europea.

Sebbene dominato da questioni economiche e aspetti tecnico-legali, il processo di allargamento dell’UE ha avuto un ruolo chiave nel superamento delle guerre degli anni ’90 e nella stabilizzazione regionale e resta un fondamentale orizzonte politico per tutti i Balcani. E ciò non dovrebbe sorprendere perché si tratta anche per l’Europa sud-orientale di accedere a quel processo storico di superamento della guerra e di costruzione di un comune spazio politico, da cui è di fatto rimasta esclusa fino alla fine degli anni ’90.

Di questa Europa i mezzi di informazione parlano poco se non quando si agitano gli animi per la paura di nuovi flussi migratori o si evidenzia l’instabilità politica che la caratterizza. Senza dubbio per alcuni paesi balcanici, con economie fragili e amministrazioni soffocate dalla corruzione, l’impegno per accedere all’integrazione europea è ancora molto oneroso. Ma nonostante tutto il processo di armonizzazione lentamente prosegue lontano dai riflettori, assistito dalla Direzione Generale per l’Allargamento della Commissione Europea e monitorato delle Commissioni del Parlamento Europeo.

Si tratta certamente di una dinamica complessa e come tale viene considerata una questione per addetti ai lavori. Eppure l’allargamento ad est dell’UE è stato ed è uno straordinario fenomeno geopolitico per il nostro continente. È sorprendente, come notava il centro studi ESI, che in questi 20 anni non sia emerso nemmeno un best seller per animare la discussione sulla riunificazione europea.

D’altro canto, uno degli aspetti principali del deficit democratico dell’UE è proprio la povertà del dibattito sulle nostre istituzioni e le nostre politiche, e l’allargamento è solo una di queste.

L’integrazione europea non è un processo facile, comporta cessione di sovranità e condivisione di oneri. I membri UE più ricchi e con democrazie mature importano parte dei problemi dei paesi più deboli anche se ne beneficiano in termini di prosperità e sicurezza in senso lato.

Invece i paesi balcanici ancora fuori dall’Unione vivono comunque le conseguenze della dipendenza economica dalla zona euro, come sottolinea Dimitar Bechev. E se fino al 2008 erano tutte economie in forte crescita, poi hanno subito duramente le conseguenze della crisi: lo shock per il crollo degli investimenti esteri, il ridursi dell’accesso al credito, la contrazione delle rimesse hanno avuto conseguenze pesanti.

La congiuntura economica che viviamo ci schiaccia su dibattiti dal respiro corto ma nei Balcani a pochi sfugge il parallelismo tra la crisi che oggi vive l’UE e quella che viveva la Jugoslavia a cavallo degli anni ’90. E se qualcosa possiamo apprendere dal passato è che in Europa nessuno esce da solo dalle crisi e senza rilanciare quel progetto comune di cui tanto abbiamo beneficiato fino ad oggi.

Grazie a Racconta l’Europa all’Europa, Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso accrescerà il suo sforzo per colmare il deficit democratico e stimolerà la discussione sull’integrazione europea dei Balcani e della Turchia con ben 11 diversi partner, in 4 paesi differenti, e non solo sul web ma anche alla radio, nelle aule universitarie, nei corsi di formazione e infine al cinema.

Anche grazie al contributo dei suoi lettori sempre più numerosi, OBC continuerà a lavorare per la costruzione dell’Europa dei cittadini facendo dialogare e mettendo in rete organizzazioni e persone tra le due sponde dell’Adriatico. Perché per tenere vivo il dibattito in Europa bisogna essere in tanti.

Egidio Ivetic

Jugoslavia sognata. Lo jugoslavismo delle origini

Fu in nome dell’idea jugoslava che Gavrilo Princip sparò e uccise Francesco Ferdinando il 28 giugno 1914, dando avvio alla Prima guerra mondiale. L’idea jugoslava, lo jugoslavismo, fu un progetto politico, sorto alla metà dell’Ottocento tra le élites croate dell’Impero asburgico. Il sogno era che croati, serbi e sloveni avessero una cultura comune, uno Stato a sé, una Jugoslavia, sotto l’egida degli Asburgo oppure del tutto indipendenti.
L’Autore propone una nuova interpretazione delle origini dello jugoslavismo, indicando l’intero periodo compreso tra il 1830 e il 1914 come una fase di gestazione. In essa, si susseguirono più jugoslavismi: dal Meridione slavo, immaginato dentro una Monarchia asburgica federale, all’illusione che fosse possibile un’unica nazione jugoslava. Ipotesi che hanno alimentato ambivalenze e contraddizioni nello jugoslavismo approdato al fatidico 1914 e che poi si sono riversate nella storia delle tre Jugoslavie novecentesche. I vent’anni di post Jugoslavia, che attualmente misuriamo, sono stati caratterizzati dalla ricerca di un senso storico nazionale scevro da qualsiasi jugoslavità, una fase che potremmo denominare posticismo jugoslavo, in cui di fatto si è affermata una specie di antimito jugoslavo. Eppure lo jugoslavismo originario, ed è la tesi di questo libro, rimane una parte imprescindibile della storia politica e culturale di chi ha condiviso l’esperienza storica delle Jugoslavie.

Egidio Ivetic (Pola 1965) insegna Storia dell’Europa orientale all’Università degli Studi di Padova. Tra i suoi recenti volumi: Le guerre balcaniche (il Mulino 2006); L’Istria moderna, 1500-1797, Una regione confine (Cierre 2010). Presso i nostri tipi ha curato con Giuseppe Gullino, Geografie confessionali. Cattolici e ortodossi nel crepuscolo della Repubblica di Venezia (1718-1797) (2009).

Indice

Introduzione
Lo jugoslavismo della storiografia
(Gli esordi; Due canonizzazioni; La frattura; La separazione)
Meridione slavo: individualità e convergenze
(I serbi; Gli sloveni; I croati; Convergenze)
Dall’illirismo alla cultura jugoslava
(L’illirismo; L’austroslavismo; Strossmayer, Racki e la Toscana jugoslava)
Pragmatismo politico e nazione jugoslava
(Il Nuovo corso; Il contesto sloveno e i partiti socialdemocratici; La questione jugoslava; Una nazione jugoslava)
Jugoslavia potenziale
Bibliografia
Indice dei nomi.

FrancoAngeli

Venerdì 16 novembre ore 17.00 Palazzo Sorbello Piazza Piccinino, 9 Perugia

Saluti: Prof. Ruggero Ranieri (Fondazione Ranieri di Sorbello) Presiede: Prof. Mario Tosti (Isuc)

Intervengono: Prof. Giuseppe Dell’Agata (Università degli Studi di Pisa) Prof. Francesco Caccamo (Università degli Studi di Pescara) Saranno presenti i curatori L’evento è organizzato in collaborazione con l’ISUC Istituto Storico Umbria Contemporanea

Igor Despot

The Balkan Wars in the Eyes of the Warring Parties: Perceptions and Interpretations

In the fall of 1912, the Ottoman Empire was in turmoil. In addition to the Albanian and the Yemen rebellions, the Empire was at war with Italy over the Libyan territory. Worse yet, cholera was spreading throughout the country, leaving a decimated population in its wake. In its weakness, the Ottoman Empire was ripe to be attacked, and the Balkan countries did so. On October 8, 1912, Montenegro declared war on the Ottoman Empire, beginning the first of the Balkan Wars. Embracing maturity and setting their differences aside, four nations joined together to form the Balkan League—Serbia, Greece, Montenegro, and Bulgaria.

Despite the tremendous land victory celebrated by the Balkan League, disputes over dividing the won territory soon arose. Dissatisfied with its share of the Macedonia, Bulgaria attacked its former allies Serbia and Greece. On August 10, 1913, the Treaty of Bucharest ended the second conflict, but it did not bring the peace. In the First World War, which was initiated by Sarajevo assassination, Balkan again became theater of the war.

The Balkan wars have been a popular topic for scholarly research since their resolution. Despite the attention this topic has received, however, the research is far from complete. In this study contributing to the documentation and understanding of this conflict, author Igor Despot has not only reviews the events of the wars, but also considers these events in light of pertinent cultural aspects, identifying the commonalities and differences that may have determined alliances or sparked conflict throughout Balkan history.

Igor Despot was born in Zagreb. He graduated from the faculty of humanities and social science of the University of Zagreb in 1998, obtaining the degree of history and philosophy professor. He obtained his master’s degree on 2008 from the same faculty. This is his PhD dissertation, which he defended in 2012.

iUniverse

Habiter l’espace post-yougoslave

PY, réseau de jeunes chercheurs européens travaillant sur les reconfigurations et les mutations ayant court dans les sociétés et les territoires post-yougoslaves, organise son premier séminaire. Première thématique que nous proposons de questionner : l’habiter ; de l’intérêt et de l’actualité de ce concept pour discuter l’évolution des rapports homme(s)-espace(s) en ex-Yougoslavie. Séminaire ouvert à tous, inscription obligatoire.

Programme de la journée

8h30 – 9h00 Accueil des participants et café

9h00-9h30    INTRODUCTION

9h00 Cyril BLONDEL, Université de Tours, France
Guillaume JAVOUREZ, Université d’Aix-Marseille I, France
Marie van EFFENTERRE, Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France
Le réseau PY
9h15 Arnaud APPRIOU, Coordinateur politique à la DG Elargissement, Commission Européenne
La question de l’habiter dans l’espace post-yougoslave

9h30-11h    SESSION 1 : Etre habitant et citoyen en ex-Yougoslavie

Discutantes :

Catherine Neveu, directrice de recherche en anthropologie, LAIOS
Marie van Effenterre, doctorante en anthropologie, LAIOS

Interventantes

9h30 Marie STOJIMIROVIC, doctorante en science politique, Université de Paris-Ouest 10
La coopération décentralisée entre les collectivités locales françaises et serbes dans le cadre de l’intégration européenne
10h15 Elise BERNARD, docteure en droit public, chargée de cours à l’INALCO, Paris
Nationalité et citoyenneté serbe : l’évolution législative en République de Serbie « Samo Sloga Srbina Spasava »

11h00-11h15 Pause café
11h15-12h45    SESSION 2 : Habiter et vivre ensemble en ex-Yougoslavie

Discutants :

Arnaud Appriou, Coordinateur politique à la DG Elargissement, Commission Européenne
Hélène Bertheleu, MCF en sociologie, Université de Tours

Interventantes

11h15 Ljubica SPAKOVSKA, doctorante en histoire, Université d’Exeter, Angleterre
Le rêve gris de couleur rouge – la dernière génération yougoslave
12h00 Fanny ARNAUD, doctorante en ethnologie et en anthropologie sociale, EHESS, Paris
Habiter Vukovar : Ethnographie d’une « ville martyr »

12h45-14h00 Déjeuner (buffet) – Département aménagement, salle Vincent Labeyrie, RDC
14h00-15h30    SESSION 3 : Habiter et se remémorer en ex-Yougoslavie

Discutants :

Benoit Feildel, MCF en aménagement, Université de Tours
Hélène Bailleul, MCF en aménagement, Université de Rennes II

Interventantes

14h00 Patrick NAEF, doctorant en géographie, Université de Genève, Suisse
Du traumascape au touristscape : perspectives croisées sur Vukovar (Croatie) et Sarajevo (Bosnie-Herzégovine)
14h45 Vladana PUTNIK, doctorante en histoire de l’art, Université de Belgrade, Serbie
Les parcs mémoriaux avant et après la Yougoslavie

15h30 – 15h45 Pause café
15h45-17h15    SESSION 4 : Habiter et délimiter en ex-Yougoslavie

Discutants :

Guillaume Javourez, doctorant en géographie, Université d’Aix-Marseille I
Cyril Blondel, doctorant en aménagement et en science politique, Université de Tours

Interventantes

15h45 Tanja TAMMINEN, docteure en science politique, chercheuse à l’Institut Finlandais des Affaires Internationales, Finlande
« Le village d’origine », la coopération transfrontalière et la construction de l’identité albanaise aujourd’hui dans la région entre le Monténégro, l’Albanie et le Kosovo
16h30 Dejan JOVANOV, doctorant en sociologie, Université de Strasbourg
Dušan RISTIĆ, doctorant en sociologie, Université de Novi Sad, Serbie
Distance(s) ethnique(s) en Voïvodine : les frontières définies par une demande à la reconnaissance sociale

17h15-18h00    Conclusion du séminaire et ouverture

17h15 Mirjana MOROKVASIC, Directrice de recherche au CNRS émérite, Institut des Sciences sociales du Politique, Paris Ouest – Nanterre, La Défense
Les évolutions du concept d’habiter, les évolutions des pratiques d’habiter à la lumière du contexte post-yougoslave : quels enseignements ?

19h30    RECEPTION à la Mairie de Tours

Second Annual Conference of the Balkan Sociological Forum

Close but Unknown Neighbors : Balkan Sociological Perspectives

9-10 November 2012 Sofia, Bulgaria

Deadline: 30th of June 201

The Conference is organized by the Balkan Sociological Forum and Bulgarian Sociological Association and supported by the International Sociological Association. It will be held parallel with the XIII Congress of the Bulgarian Sociological Association on November 9-10, 2012 in Sofia.

Place of the topic in relation to state-of-the-art in sociology The Balkans have been systematically studied by historians, anthropologists, cultural studies experts, art historians, but have rarely been placed in a general sociological perspective. Comparative studies on separate social problems have rarely included more than three or four countries. In fact, from a sociological perspective, Balkan countries pose a double challenge: social and cognitive. There is the social aspect, for even though they have a shared past of authoritarian and totalitarian regimes in different periods of the 20th century, their social and political development in post WW2 Europe has not been the same for all countries. Their common present situation of transition to a market economy and democratic structures like those of Western Europe, does not cancel the specific ordeals of economic, political, and social development that each national society of the Balkans is going through. Engrossed as we are in the supra-national structures of the EU and of Transatlantic cooperation, we hardly notice our neighbours; moreover, we fail to realize that the position of each country on the international scene depends on its relations with, and the support of, its closest environment. In competing for international recognition, our interest in neighbouring countries is all too often limited to what can be advantageous though detrimental to them. Thus we miss the chance of working together to overcome our common weaknesses and achieve mutual consolidation of our separate advantages. In scrutinizing our own problems, we fail to look around us and see that, within the proximate region – so close to us by its historical destiny and present state of civilization, some country may have already found a solution to some of our own problems. What are our Balkan neighbours like as economic and political players, as stratified societies and united communities, as educational and cultural structures, as ways of living together and recognizing the other? What is happening here and now in each Balkan country? How does the past impact on the present in each country and in the relations between them? What part of the contemporary experience of each country could be useful for its neighbours, so that our presence in united Europe and in the world might be constructive, mutually enriching, and stimulating? These are all questions to which sociology, with its rich variety of paradigms and approaches, can provide well-argued and thoughtful answers. As concerns the Balkans as a cognitive challenge, this aspect consists foremost in the problems that the current processes of internationalization and interdisciplinary scientific knowledge pose for sociology. The national communities of sociologists in Balkan countries compete to win a place in the European production of interdisciplinary and policy-oriented knowledge, but we are also partners playing non-hegemonic roles in the international research area. These combined features provide a suitable starting point for analysis, and our integration in the European Research Area clarifies a number of problems, such as:

· the marginalization of national sociological traditions;

· the neutralization of local issues by presenting them as Eastern equivalents of problems formulated with reference to the West European social and research context;

· the irrelevance of applying a theoretical framework to social situations in separate national contexts;

· the replacement of scientific argumentation as to the validity of knowledge by imperatives of immediate applicability;

· the tension between local vocation vs. international involvement; the growing dependence of the research structure and the type of knowledge produced relative to the forms of funding and the supra-national management of scientific production, etc.

Objectives and topics The main objective of the Second Annual Conference of BSF is by identifying the common and specific problems in the contemporary development of Balkan countries, to contribute to a better understanding of our own society, and to the development of sociology as a cognitive solution to the contextual problems, a solution based on adequate theoretical and methodological tools.

The discussions will be organized around the following thematic centers: · The Contemporary Economic Crisis: Political Solutions, Technological Answers, Individual Strategies; · Mobility and Social Inequalities; · Global Social Order, States, Citizens; · Transformations of Identities and Social Relationships in the Balkans; · National Sociological Traditions and the Sociologist’s Vocation Today.

Organization and deadlines Balkan Sociological Forum and Bulgarian Sociological Association invite scholars and students of sociology and other social sciences from all Balkan countries and colleagues outside the Balkans working jointly with sociologists from this region to take part in the Second Conference of BSF.

Please, send your proposals until June 30th 2012 to the following addresses: bsa @ sociology . bas . bg and diana @ sociology . bas . bg .

Conference languages: Bulgarian and English

Deadlines: · 30th of June 2012: Abstract submission · 15th of July 2012: Confirmation of abstract acceptance · 30th of September 2012: Participants registration · 25th of October 2012: Conference programme

Abstracts should be contained the following items: · Name · Professional status (student, Ph.D. student, professor, research fellow, experts, etc.) · Institution · Title and abstract up to 20 lines/or 200 words/or 1500 sings in English Accommodation and other details will be announced before 10th of October 2012.

Organizers and Organizing Committee Bulgarian Sociological Association (www.bsa-bg.org) Balkan Sociological Forum Organizing Committee Lekë SOKOLI – president of the Balkan Sociological Forum, University Martin Barleti, Tirana, Albania Svetla KOLEVA – vice-president of the Balkan Sociological Forum, president of the Bulgarian Sociological Association, Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria Gjon BORIÇI – Albanian University, Tirana, Albania Ognjen ČALDAROVIĆ – president of Croatian Sociological Association Todor GALEV – Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria Maya GREKOVA – Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria Ivo HRISTOV – Plovdiv University Paisii Hilendarski, Bulgaria Martin KANOUSHEV – New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria Jonida LAMAJ – Balkan Sociological Forum Secretary, Albanian Institute of Sociology Svetla MARINOVA – Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria Mihail MIRCHEV – University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria Diana NENKOVA – Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria Andrei NONCHEV – University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria Ali PAJAZITI – South East European University, Tetovo, Macedonia Miroslava RADEVA – Plovdiv University Paisii Hilendarski and MBMD Ltd., Bulgaria Sunai RAIMI – State University of Tetovo, Macedonia Rumiana STOILOVA – Institute for the Study of Societies and Knowledge, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia, Bulgaria Gorgi TONOVSKI – FON University, Skopje, Macedonia

Les transformations des espaces académiques centre-est-européens depuis 1989

Jeudi 10 mai 2012  |  Paris (75014)

Cette journée d’études vise à interroger, de manière comparée, les transformations des systèmes de l’enseignement supérieur à partir de plusieurs terrains centre-est-européens. Il s’agit, d’une part, d’étudier les réformes postcommunistes et libérales de l’enseignement supérieur en tant qu’elles s’inscrivent dans les transformations plus générales de l’État. L’analyse se focalise non seulement sur les changements institutionnels rendus possibles par les lois successives mais aussi sur les artisans de ces réformes, leurs parcours et leurs prises de position dans les débats publics. D’autre part, nous intégrons la dimension internationale en interrogeant le concours des experts en provenance d’institutions internationales tout comme des fondations philanthropiques. Notre attention se porte sur l’appropriation et l’investissement diversifiés de ces programmes par les acteurs nationaux.

Le projet de formation-recherche du CIERA 2011-2013 vise à interroger, de manière comparée, les transformations des systèmes de l’enseignement supérieur à partir de plusieurs terrains centre-est-européens. Il s’agit, d’une part, d’interroger les réformes postcommunistes et libérales de l’enseignement supérieur en tant qu’elles s’inscrivent dans les transformations plus générales de l’État. L’analyse se focalise non seulement sur les changements institutionnels rendus possibles par les lois successives mais aussi sur les artisans de ces réformes, leurs parcours et leurs prises de position dans les débats publics. D’autre part, nous intégrons la dimension internationale en interrogeant le concours des experts en provenance d’institutions internationales tout comme des fondations philanthropiques. Notre attention se portera sur l’appropriation et l’investissement diversifiés de ces programmes par les acteurs nationaux. S’agissant de la référence incontournable que constitue aujourd’hui le processus de Bologne, notre projet ambitionne d’interroger sa réception et la manière dont celui-ci se matérialise dans les pays étudiés, en se penchant sur les experts qui circulent entre l’espace national et l’espace européen et en orientant la focale sur ceux qui vivent ce processus au quotidien.
Programme de formation-recherche du CIERA, en coopération avec CRPS/Paris I, GSPE/UdS, CERCEC/EHESS, Université Humboldt Berlin/Faculté des Sciences sociales, Foreduc/Paris Ouest Nanterre et ISP/Paris Ouest Nanterre
Programme

9h30 Introduction / Opening remarks

9h45-12h30
Première session : Les réformes de l’enseignement supérieur dans le contexte des transformations systémiques : la recomposition du rapport public / privé
Session I: Higher Education Reform and Systemic Transformations: Reshaping the Public/Private Balance

Présidente / Chair: Laure Neumayer (MCF, Paris I, CESSP-CRPS),

Carole Sigman (CR, CNRS, Paris), Le brouillage des frontières public/privé dans l’enseignement supérieur russe depuis la chute de l’URSS

Daniel Hechler (Doctorant, Institut für Hochschulforschung Wittenberg), The transformation of the East German Higher Education 1989-1995 and the memory of communist rule at East German universities

Julita Jabłecka (Professeure, Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu-National Louis University, Nowy Sącz), Transformation of Polish Higher Education between 1990-2011: looking back, ahead or around?

Svetlana Dimitrova (Post-doctorante, Université de Bretagne Occidentale Brest – EHESS, Paris), Les transformations de l’enseignement supérieur en Bulgarie au début des années 1990 : un problème de reconnaissance ?

Žarko Dragšić (Doctorant, INCHER, Université de Kassel), The Rise of Private Higher Education in Croatia and Macedonia

Discutante: Annie Vinokur (Professeur émérite d’économie, Université Paris Ouest Nanterre)

12h30-14h00 Pause déjeuner / Lunch

14h00-16h00
Deuxième session. Saisir le changement : disciplines, professions, nouveaux lieux de production de savoirs
Session II: Understanding Change: New Academic Disciplines, Professions and New Knowledge Production Sites

Présidente / Chair: Carole Sigman

Irmina Matonyte (Professeure, ISM University of Management and Economics, Vilnius), Emergence of political sciences in Lithuania in the early 1990s: the role of external actors and leverages

Valentin Behr (Doctorant, Université de Strasbourg), Les historiens polonais entre transformations de l’espace académique et les recompositions du jeu politique

Pierre-Louis Six (Doctorant, IUE de Florence), Une perspective institutionnelle : le MGIMO entre recomposition de ses rapports à l’Etat et internationalisation

Laure Neumayer (MCF, Paris I), L’invention d’une discipline académique : les études européennes en République tchèque

Discutante : Anja Röcke (Chercheure, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften)

16h-16h30 Pause café/ Coffee break

16h30-18h.
Table ronde avec la participation d’experts internationaux de l’enseignement supérieur suivie d’une discussion générale
Round table with Higher Education international experts and general discussion

Lazar Vlasceanu (Professeur, Université de Bucarest)

Nina Kancewicz-Hoffman (Docteure, Chef d’unité Humanités et Sciences sociales, European Science Foundation)

Discussion animée par Ioana Cîrstocea et Dorota Dakowska

Comité d’organisation / Organizing committee:

Ioana Cîrstocea (CR, CNRS, GSPE)
Dorota Dakowska (MCF, IEP Strasbourg, GSPE)
Laure Neumayer (MCF, Paris I, CESSP-CRPS)
Anja Röcke (Chercheure, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften)
Carole Sigman (CR, CNRS, ISP, CERCEC)

Inscription gratuite mais obligatoire auprès d’Estelle Czerny

Tel : 03 68 85 61 65
Courriel : estelle.czerny@misha.fr

Aula 3 della Facoltà di Scienze della Formazione, ore 17:30
via Tigor 22, Trieste

presentazione del libro Dopo la pioggia. Gli stati dell’ex Jugoslavia e l’Albania (1991-2011),  a cura di Antonio D’Alessandri e Armando Pitassio

sarenno presenti Giuseppe Battelli ( DiSU), Marco Dogo (DiSU), Mila Orlić (Irsml FVG / Dipartimento di Storia, Università di Rijeka-Fiume), Raoul Pupo (DSPS)

Leonard J. Cohen and John R. Lampe

Embracing Democracy in the Western Balkans. From Postconflict Struggles toward European Integration

Cohen and Lampe offer a comparative, cross-regional study of the politics and economics of Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia, Macedonia, Montenegro, Kosovo, and Albania from 1999 until the present. It is during this period that the first wave of post-communist regime transition ended and the region became more deeply involved in the challenges of democratic consolidation. The authors explore the legacies of communist rule, the impact of incentives and impediments on reform, and the magnetic pull of European Union accession. The authors ask whether the Western Balkans are embracing democracy by creating functional, resilient institutions—governmental, administrative, journalistic, and economic—and fostering popular acceptance and trust in the legitimacy of those institutions.

Woodrow Wilson Center Press with The Johns Hopkins University Press